I don't object to Palin's style, or her family choices. I do have problems with her fundamentalism (Fresne says it well) and most of all with the fact that she has not yet made a national speech that she wrote, or faced a press conference. I'm concerned about the views she puts forth about Creationism, choice, global warming, the environment. Paglia questions whether she really holds the views imputed to her, but I haven't heard any protests from her about how she's represented on those counts.
Paglia is right about some problems with the Obama campaign. I'm worried, too. Where is James Carville when we need him?
I commented in fresne's journal, but I'll repeat here:
I think the difficulty of articles like the one by Paglia is that she mixes her message rather badly. She lavishes praise on Palin to the extent that it becomes easy to miss that she herself supports Obama and admires Palin more or less solely for her 'moxie' while possibly disagreeing with her on all issues besides the one that women can be strong.
Very true! I had to read it a couple of times to be sure that was what she was saying. Paglia in the past has liked some weird people as part of her "bad girl" image. I see what she finds appealing in Palin--they have a similar presentation.
Also, http://www.factcheck.org/ is a good site, run by the Annenberg Foundation--they've noted some real problems in representing the candidates.
But if we can believe the NY Times, sometimes they misstate their own cases: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/us/politics/11pipeline.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=login
From:
Even though her ego is way too big already,
From:
Re: Even though her ego is way too big already,
Paglia is right about some problems with the Obama campaign. I'm worried, too. Where is James Carville when we need him?
From:
no subject
I think the difficulty of articles like the one by Paglia is that she mixes her message rather badly. She lavishes praise on Palin to the extent that it becomes easy to miss that she herself supports Obama and admires Palin more or less solely for her 'moxie' while possibly disagreeing with her on all issues besides the one that women can be strong.
From:
no subject
From:
Just because it seems appropriate
From:
Re: Just because it seems appropriate
From:
Re: Just because it seems appropriate
From:
Re: Just because it seems appropriate
But if we can believe the NY Times, sometimes they misstate their own cases:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/us/politics/11pipeline.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=login
From:
Re: Just because it seems appropriate