Well, today I set out to join a group from our local peace resource center. We've been setting up to work on counter-recruitment--letting kids know that they don't have to give their names to military recruiters, and that they have other options. We were going to have a table at a career fair for 8th graders, and were going to tell them about things like grants for college, service organizations like American Friends Service Committee, etc. And we were planning to wear our group's T shirts, which say "Peace is Patriotic" on the front and have the group name on the back.

The fair was for the public schools, but was being held at a community center at the local army base. (I must admit I was wondering if this would all work out. I've worked with the group for a long time, and they are sensible but forthright, but did not know this particular committee or the people organizing the event because they meet on a night when I have another commitment.)

The event started at 10 and my shift was going to be 12-2. I got in the gate with no trouble--they had our names listed by the event organizers and so let us through. But when I got to the center, I was told that our group had been asked to leave. So I started to leave. The MP's stopped me, took my ID, made me wait while they wrote down all my ID info, and escorted me off base, keeping my driver's license until I was off the base. I asked why and they said that it was because I had on the shirt. I told them I was leaving but had not been told I should not wear the shirt. They were reasonably polite except for one who rather belligerently asked me if I had told them I was from the peace organization when I arranged to come out. I said I hadn't made the arrangements and didn't know.

A woman from the Career Focus,evidently, also came out and was apologetic, in a way, but said the literature had been inappropriate, that someone had shoved a security person, and that they hadn't known we'd be distributing anti-military handouts and wearing the T shirts. She said she "had problems with how the incident was handled on both sides."

I'd like very much to know what the real story was, and what to expect they'll do with the information they took down from me. I haven't been able to talk to the other people who were there when whatever it was happened, but I'll bet there's more to it. Stay tuned.
Tags:

From: [identity profile] wisewoman.livejournal.com


I just wish all my lj friends would come and live in Canada. It makes me irrationally angry and somewhat frightened when I read of incidents like this.

:o(
ann1962: (Default)

From: [personal profile] ann1962


I just wish all my lj friends would come and live in Canada.


That may just happen. I will post about it later.

From: [identity profile] wisewoman.livejournal.com


Well, that certainly sounds intriguing, and exciting! Can't wait to hear more...

;o)
ann1962: (Default)

From: [personal profile] ann1962


LOL, the most southern part of Canada is Windsor Ontario, where I was born. However I do not want to live there, so we will have to choose another spot.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Anywhere with space for a very glorious city...we can cover part of it with a dome and have our own climate, as long as we're at it.

Also waiting to hear the rest of the story...

From: [identity profile] midnightsjane.livejournal.com


Hey, I'd go live there! As long as it wasn't somewhere where you actually have to shovel snow....hee.
It's scarey to think that wearing a shirt can be considered a threat to security.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


I want to live there too! Knock, knock...

But actually, I could avoid it by living even in Illinois. Somebody has to make the police state a little harder to maintain.

Thanks. If you see someone trudging up the street with a knapsack...

From: [identity profile] maeve-rigan.livejournal.com

Badness


Really bad news. I guess we could have seen this kind of censorship coming, but it is so deeply regrettable, all the same. "Problems with how the incident was handled on both sides"--indeed! Yes, I, too would like to know the real story, and why a "career fair" is being held at a military base at all?


From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com

Re: Badness


Yes. I'm sure my group probably was more provocative than should have been, and I won't go to something I haven't planned, after this, but still...The MP's kept saying "This is a military base" and I kept being old stone face, but finally, on about the tenth repetition, said, "So that means it's not the United States anymore?"
ann1962: (Default)

From: [personal profile] ann1962

Re: Badness


Oh, the military recruits big time. I see them at all of the career fairs I attend. Eye candy yes, but jeez. Between them, seminary recruiters and the IRS recruiters, I always have someone to talk to!

From: [identity profile] knullabulla.livejournal.com

Re: Badness


how the heck does the IRS recruit?

Seminaries have promises of eternal salvation.
Military has shiny Hummers.

What does the IRS use? Sexy blonde bomb-shells discussing the pleasures of filling out forms in triplicate?
ann1962: (Default)

From: [personal profile] ann1962

Re: Badness


They were at a career fair handing out applications and brochures trying to find new employees.

What does the IRS use?

Actually they were two dorky guys complaining about being audited every five years. If you work there, you get audited a lot. They were wandering around from table to table making jokes about the IRS. I figured they were trying to show that they were wild and crazy guys.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com

Re: Badness


My son had a very faithful recruiter, who came over to visit in the evenings. Since my son's father was a conscientious objector and my son had a heart problem, the whole thing was sort of a joke to us. But not to my students.

From: [identity profile] knullabulla.livejournal.com


Was it an actual career fair? or was it "Careers in the Military, sponsored by the U.S. Army"? Were you able to tell if the other job recruiters were all military themed, or if there was actual variety?

This takes all whole new angle since you were booted out by a government entity... but I'm wondering if this is a free speach issue or just "privilege of the host"? If we look at it in terms of non-government hosts: would it be out of line for a recruitment fair hosted by "Toxic Polluters for Drilling in Alaska" to bar Greenpeace from putting up a stand? or for one hosted by PETA to not permit a booth from the American Fur Association? Do government bodies have the right to say who can recruit at fairs they host?

Was the woman at Career Focus the one who booked your group? It sounds like she didn't actually BOTHER to read about your organizations goals and aims. She's the reason that you end up seeing recruiters for jobs in accounting at engineering job fairs, and recruiters for jobs in upper management at entry-level career expos. But instead of actually admitting that she might have hand in things....

And I hate to say it... but as a potential terrorist OMG!!! peace demonstrator, the government's been keeping records on you LONG before this.

Remember, you do have the right to see your FBI/police records. They'll give you shit for requesting it ("oh only people who have SOMETHING to worry about ask for that!"), but you have a right to know.

Crossing fingers and toes that you don't end up on a "no fly" list.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Oh, I know about my record! It dates back to the sixties. I would love to have all the time and money they've probably wasted keeping track of me. I am hardly a big threat to national security, but so easy to find.

I think the question of why the fair was there is really the biggie. It was billed as just "Careers" to the students, but may have been a military thing in disguise. But if that's so, why are the kids being bussed there? This is a public school--were they able to say no? and at that age, would they?

Yes, they had the right to kick us out. But why did they let us in to start with?

The thing is, the military is able to get into kid's lives at an early age and present its views with no opposition. Who falls for the pitch? The poor trying to become middle class, who aren't informed of other ways of getting there. That's why we don't have a draft.

And think about why Bush's new budget cuts college loans. One of the main reasons people go into the military is to get college paid for, but if they can borrow money, they don't do that.

It's not a fair system, and needs to be challenged.

From: [identity profile] hfx-ben.livejournal.com


A great way to follow up stuff like this is to actually be simon pure ... make the obvious inquiries so as to leave no ill will. I would be that the facts will just tumble out on there on when someone with a truly bad attitude will run their mouth.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Absolutely agree. I'm posting a follow-up as soon as I get permission to quote someone. What you recommend is what I hope will happen, but it's hard to do, when the newspapers take their version as gospel and ignore ours.

From: [identity profile] hfx-ben.livejournal.com


"... when the newspapers take their version as gospel and ignore ours."
Have to give them reason to cover your angle ... it's less a corrupt system than a mindlessly omnivorous beast.

From: [identity profile] hfx-ben.livejournal.com


"We have to look for the angles that will work that way."
That's the point, and the advantage / benefit: practitioners have no need to fantasize ... angry dogs are angry dogs, and corrupt bureaucrats are etc etc etc.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Actually, while the media angle is dead on in most cases, here we're actually aiming at personal contact with the kids, and that means going through the schools. So less may be more.

I'll explain in greater detail in a post shortly, but you may disagree.

From: [identity profile] hfx-ben.livejournal.com


Well, disagree ... I doubt that it's black or white.

But I also doubt that writing off media entirely is good tactic.

From: [identity profile] hfx-ben.livejournal.com

p.s.


Since the late 70s I've been saying that the right has trumped the progressive on the use of IT. More recently, with the up-welling of anti-capitalist energy, I've been pointing to how the right has been using increasingly effective populist tactics.

Viz.: "How to get straight to the people: control the message, stage the event (http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/shared/news/nation/stories/0213_BUSH_COMMUNICATIONS.html)"
(That's the stuff my peers and I have been doing for years; I'm living in a chill basement room, at 50. The rightist consultants are having booming careers. Go figure.)

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com

Re: p.s.


So true. 40 years ago, you could manipulate media by creating a ruckus they had to cover. Not so simple now, since the coverage is managed.

And that's the thing with the Bush events. Fritz Hollings, the Democratic Senator from SC who just retired, had similar meetings for years, but didn't have the $$ to get the media to cover them.

And that might explain your situation also.

From: [identity profile] hfx-ben.livejournal.com

Re: p.s.


"Not so simple now, since the coverage is managed.

0_o

Dunno ... my ruckus' have done pretty well, all things considered. Any anyhow, better bad press than no press.

"the Democratic Senator from SC who just retired, had similar meetings for years, but didn't have the $$ to get the media to cover them. And that might explain your situation also."
Just so ... the buzzword I use is "economic warfare". Basically, a tremendous proportion of "progressives" are hypocrits.
/shrug/
And raisins have wrinkles.

.

Profile

mamculuna: (Default)
mamculuna

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags