mamculuna: (Default)
([personal profile] mamculuna Nov. 3rd, 2007 09:04 am)
Below is a somewhat long recounting of what happened yesterday when people in my city tried to stage a peaceful protest as Bush rode by to visit Fort Jackson. The person who organized the protest and wrote the account is a very gentle and non-confrontational guy, a Vietnam vet who has long led a group of military families against the war who have protested legally since before the war began. Previously the police showed up only if there were counter-protestors and never intervened or limited our protests. I wasn't with the group yesterday, but am angry that this happened.


Summary of Police Intimidation Incident and Peaceful Protest of President Bush/Lindsey Graham Fund-raiser

Today, November 2, 2007, in Columbia, SC, today, activists had arrived by 10:30 on the sidewalk across the street from the entrance to the plantation on Garners Ferry Road, where the Republican barbecue fund-raiser was being held. Participants ranged from college students to an 80 year old WWII veteran and were citizens or representatives of various peace groups. Activists and protesters were orderly, quiet, and held signs in protest of the Iraq War, to advocate for the care of our troops, and to insist that Bush-Graham politicians do not rush to still another war with Iran.

At about 10:45 a.m., Columbia police suddenly demanded that all protesters were to move down the hill to the far end of Woodhill Mall, which by the way would take us and signs out of the view of traffic and politicians entering the barbecue. Upon asking an officer why, he said that the order was given to officers this morning by their captain. As an organizer of the demonstration, I asked why was such an order given? I reminded officers that Columbia city police have agreed and cooperated with us for four years in the exercise of our right to assemble and protest as long as there is no disturbance or interference with traffic. I asked to speak to the officer in charge. He approached and spoke angrily that we must move. He then told me that I had 10 seconds to move to the bottom of the hill.

Other participants also asked why the denial of our right to protest? I asked who we might speak with to allow our protest to continue. I asked who had made the decision because there would be a formal challenge regarding the denial of our assembly and any threat made. He said that Harold Reaves, interim police chief, had made the decision. I asked to speak to him. The answer was no. I then told him that at a prior demonstration at the Republican presidential candidates debate, Mr. Reaves, who was then with Homeland Security in Columbia, after conversation did agree that we have the right to peacefully demonstrate, and the requirement was that we remained on the sidewalk across from that event without causing disruption. So, what partisan political fund-raiser planners may have influenced the attempted denial of our right as citizens to protest? We should ask the host of the barbecue. I understand that he may be a member of the Columbia City Council, so perhaps he might assist us to find an answer.

After talking with the officer in charge, additional police cars arrived blocking protesters and our signs from the view of arriving Republican fund-raiser guests. A police van pulled up directly in front of us and the back doors were opened. Participants, including the wise WWII veteran, continued to remind the police that we were rightfully there, in peaceful assembly and protest. As the police escalated an unnecessary confrontation, two protesters phoned 911, and reported that we were being threatened by the police. Shortly after, a black car with a man and woman in formal dress parked in front of us. As they were talking beside the car I twice asked to speak to them. They heard my requests, turned away, and went over to talk with police. We were soon informed that our protest with our signs could continue as long as we stayed on the sidewalk. The intimidation and threat to violate our right of dissent somehow ended. Although there were a few Bush war supporters with their signs and shirts just a few yards from us, they were never challenged by police. I and other protesters thanked the front-line police for their presence and assistance. Our peaceful protest with signs against the war and its fundraising politicians continued until 12:30 p.m. without further incident.

Activist citizens must continue to peacefully assemble and exercise our right of dissent, that there shall be accountability for the contrived war and an end to the bloodshed and mental destruction of military, loved ones, and families. As a war veteran, I will peacefully protest as long as soldiers and families continue to be betrayed to the endless killing in Iraq, as long as warful politicians continue their rush of reckless funding of that killing. I thank all those who gathered today with their dedicated sincerity, courage, and perserverance, who stood with determination and gave their voices in dissent for peace, to bring troops home and care, and to demand there be no more wars committed by liars. To make us right with integrity, out the civil war capital politicians' hypocrisy. There will be a formal complaint regarding the attempted coup of our today's protest.


This kind of thing has happened here before, but the guy who was arrested in 2003 was a well-known civil disobedience person, which yesterday's group is not.
usedtobeljs: (Juliet Stevenson as Madame Arkadina)

From: [personal profile] usedtobeljs


That is horrifying... and surprising only in that the protest was allowed to continue. I've seen too many news stories about the Bush people enforcing unutterably restrictive distance 'rules'.

Well done on the protesters.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


I agree. Our police have been known as very good guys, and the problems we've had before here have been with Secret Service. And sadly, this is all too common.

From: [identity profile] arethusa2.livejournal.com


The police must be pressed very very hard on this. We don't have the right to assemble if we let them take it away. Every protest needs a copy of all applicable laws, plus lawyers and people willing to go to jail for a while. Sick, but true.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Yes, very true. We've had people go to trial over this in the past. I'm impressed that they managed to hold the protest this time.

From: [identity profile] arethusa2.livejournal.com


It's sad to see so many police side with the establishment, but it's not a surprise that they might be authoritarian.

Hmmmm, protesters need better signs and slogans. Something that everyone would agree with automatically, like "Protect the US Constitution" or "Keep the Government Out of Our Lives" or "Follow the Law!" or "Help Save Soldiers' Lives." You have to appeal to emotions as well as reason.


From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


This group is pretty good with the signs--"Love the troops, hate the war" is one that comes to mind. We're an army town and have a lot of vets (the WWII vet volunteered to be arrested, at 87!) and vets' families, so we're pretty sensitive to that.

From: [identity profile] ponygirl2000.livejournal.com


Would that that were true (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/08/22/ot-police-070822.html). And that's just off the top of my head. Thugs with agendas to protect the ruling class are the same the world over.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


In a way, I know that's true. We'd like to think there's an enchanted world of righteousness just north of the border.

And yet so many people in my family came here to escape various evils of other governments in past years--I always feel wishful that's there's somewhere we can escape. What if what we see is what we get?

From: [identity profile] ponygirl2000.livejournal.com


I remember a lot of history books used to go on about the importance of the idea of the West in North America - that belief that there was always somewhere further west to escape to. Until of course they reached the sea. I'd like to think that once the idea of escape has been exhausted people would work to create the world that they want to live in, but really we find escape in different ways.

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Yes. My first husband's parents weren't Jewish, but they saw that Germany was headed in an evil direction so left to come here in the 20's. Maybe if more people like them had stayed and tried to change things, it could have been different. But I've been trying here for 40 years, and it seems to be headed in the other direction...

From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


Oops, missed your link on first reading. I saw that when it happened, and was disgusted. I've been in a situation like that, back in the 60's, when provacateurs more than once turned a peaceful protest violent. Eventually participants caught on and outed them then, but the Canadian one was the grand example!
ext_7287: (Default)

From: [identity profile] lakrids404.livejournal.com


People who does something active to change the world for the better, are some people I admire. Sadly enough from a distance, as I have not personally found something, who could animate me, to more than to send some money, and vote at every election (except for the local church council :) ).
This couch potato salute you.



From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com


I was unfortunately a couch potato myself this time, but I have joined them on many other occasions. Just don't let your own government ever be civil to these thugs!
.

Profile

mamculuna: (Default)
mamculuna

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags