I will admit to having been a Nader supporter in 2000 [ducks flying rotten fruit] but things were different then. We had no clue that George II was a certifiable lunatic. Now we know. And persuasive as Nader's arguments are about the need for more than two parties, both in debt to corporations, the fact is that right now a defeat for Bush is a defeat for his policies. It's true that both parties are heavily in debt to corporations, and the Dems probably won't make the major changes they should make, but they don't have the indebtedness to the extreme social conservative base of Bush & Co.
I encourage no one to vote for Nader. He's making a mistake.
I encourage no one to vote for Nader. He's making a mistake.
Tags: